Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Nest's avatar

Great round-up, Charlie! While I'm familiar with all of the names on the list, it's nice to have a comparative look in a single place.

I've signed up for Claude all the way back in V1 days but sadly, much like many other AI products, it's not yet available to us Europeans. Still on the waitlist for now. According to this post by Ethan Mollick, Claude actually outperforms ChatGPT when it comes to parsing and working with PDF files (https://www.linkedin.com/posts/emollick_there-was-a-big-new-ai-release-today-claude-activity-7084733526662623232-1XDb/)

Pi is quite wonderful at being an insightful and enthusiastic conversation partner - not sure if you've tried it? If you did, curious to hear your impressions.

I missed the context for the "flat out wrong" quote about open-sourcing AI models in this piece. So I had to look it up. Sutskever's full quote indicates he believes that open-sourcing is a bad idea because AGI is coming and it's dangerous to have more (bad) actors in the game? Or something.

Full quote: "We were wrong. Flat out, we were wrong. If you believe, as we do, that at some point, AI — AGI — is going to be extremely, unbelievably potent, then it just does not make sense to open-source. It is a bad idea... I fully expect that in a few years it’s going to be completely obvious to everyone that open-sourcing AI is just not wise.”

Not sure I buy the premise, because if it's that risky, I don't see how having a single company cook it up in a non-transparent "black box" is a comforting thought?

Expand full comment
Andrew Smith's avatar

Nice, Charlie!

Open AI has the zeitgeist for now, and it's hard to imagine one of these upending their dominance, but if history is any indicator, it'll happen.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts